Designing enterprise client and risk capabilities for a fragmented and uncertain world

I design enterprise capabilities that enable large financial institutions to understand, govern, and operate complex client relationships and networks — safely, coherently, and over time.

The problem

Financial institutions increasingly operate through complex client structures, interdependent networks, and evolving business arrangements. Risk emerges not only at the individual client level, but across portfolios, jurisdictions, and time.

Many organisations still manage this complexity through fragmented processes, legacy definitions of “client”, and change initiatives that improve parts of the system while weakening the whole.

This is not a technology problem.
It is a capability design problem.

What I work on

I work at the intersection of:

  • client lifecycle management

  • network and structural risk

  • operating models and governance

  • data, controls, and performance

The focus is not delivery for its own sake, but building durable enterprise capabilities that continue to function under regulatory pressure, market change, and organisational churn.

How I approach these problems

Start from the business arrangement, rather than existing organisational or system structures

  1. Design for flow, integrity, and durability, not best practice

  2. Treat operating models as engineered systems, not static blueprints

  3. Work across risk, operations, technology, and the business as a single system

  4. Optimise for institutional coherence, not local outcome.

Key frameworks

  • Client Network Risk Management (CNRM)
    Understanding risk across interconnected client structures and networks

  • Entity–Role–Relationship (ERR)
    A structural model for representing clients, roles, and business arrangements coherently

  • Enterprise Client Lifecycle Management (E-CLM)
    CLM understood and governed as an enterprise capability, not a function

  • Operating Model Engineering
    Designing operating models for performance, stability, and change

  • TOM → Feature Pathway
    Connecting intent, design, and implementation.

Learn more

Who this is relevant to

This work is relevant to leaders responsible for:

  • enterprise risk and control

  • client lifecycle and onboarding

  • large-scale transformation

  • complex operating models

  • regulatory credibility.

Context

The material on this site reflects a long-term body of work on how complex financial institutions can remain resilient as client structures, regulation, and geopolitical conditions continue to evolve.

It is intended to be read selectively, reused in discussion, and applied with judgement.